Unicode now accepting proposals for Emoji 16.0
It’s hard to believe that just as Emoji 14.0 begins to appear on
your device of choice this year, the Unicode Emoji Subcommittee [ESC] has
already begun to plan for Emoji 16.0. That’s right, as of today — April 4, 2022
— applications to submit ideas for new emoji are open through July 31, 2022!
So, how do you ensure your proposal is the best it can be? Well,
here are some tips for consideration as you prepare it.
Check whether the emoji already exists!
✅ First: See if it’s already
🤔 Second, is it
🧑🏾🏫 Tip: Don’t skip any of the fields in the form! Incomplete
proposals won’t be processed and will be returned. The ESC team members get a
lot of submissions and
complete proposals help them evaluate the submissions.
Be sure your proposal meets the criteria for consideration.
We recommend being faithful to the
criteria for inclusion as
much as possible and to consult the Emoji Subcommittee’s
Many of the new provisional candidates for Emoji 15.0 are the result of these
rightwards pushing hand. The following are just some of the many
considerations for writing a compelling proposal:
candidate emoji have significant metaphorical references or symbolism and
not merely represent itself?
Use in sequences
How is the
emoji used with other emoji to communicate something new?
Breaking new ground
emoji represent something that is not already representable?
and why this emoji represents a distinct, visually iconic entity that is
relevant to a global audience
Is it needed for
compatibility with frequently-used emoji in popular existing systems, such
as WeChat, Twitter, etc.
Frequency of Use
Is there a
frequency of use? There should be empirical evidence of high usage in
literature, movies, graphic novels, etc. worldwide.
Examples can be found on
under “Selection Factors”
Well, let’s get going! How do I propose an emoji?
My proposal wasn’t selected :(
We recognize that it will come as a disappointment
if your proposal is not one of the few selected for inclusion. 💕 There are
loads of reasons why this may have happened.
➕ It can already be represented by a sequence
(Ex. Garbage fire 🗑️🔥, Can of worms 🥫🪱)
🔍 It’s too specific
We can’t add every type of flower, every breed of dog, every color of drink
💰 Very few are selected
Roughly thirty emoji characters are added each year
🐣 It’s a transient concept
Think less “memes” and more “stable long-standing concepts”. Can you cite
how this concept has existed in a communicative manner such as literature,
movies, graphic novels, etc.?
♾️ It’s open-ended
There is no compelling evidence to add it over others of a similar type
❌ Many other factors for exclusion
Why can’t we make EVERYTHING an emoji?
Any emoji additions have to take into consideration
trade-offs with other choices, font file size, and the burden on developers (and
users!) to make it easier to send and receive emoji. That’s why the Emoji
Subcommittee set out to
reduce the number of emoji we encode in any given year.
Reconciling the rapid, transient nature of modern communication with the formal,
methodical process required by a standards body like the Unicode Consortium is
the name of the game these days. Until the sending and receiving of images is
standardized in some manner so you can send any image in the world alongside
your text messages not just code points … well, Unicode is here for the world’s
emoji character needs. 🫂💖
to help the Unicode Consortium’s work on digitally disadvantaged languages